Research Themes

OPTIMA’s research is organised around three themes to address the needs of industry.

Integrate

Many academic fields contribute to optimisation methodologies and technologies, but the siloed nature of these efforts creates missed opportunities. OPTIMA integrates multidisciplinary optimisation approaches, led by world‑leading investigators who span relevant disciplines, into a common and accessible toolkit. By tackling industry problems that need insight from multiple fields, OPTIMA dissolves silos and makes state‑of‑the‑art optimisation methodologies easier for industry to use.

Advance

Industrial optimisation problems are typically messier and more complex than classical textbook examples. They are large in scale, involve multiple competing objectives, contain uncertainties from many sources and require decisions across different time scales. OPTIMA advances an industry‑ready optimisation toolkit that supports these complexities, informed by our collection of real challenge problems from industry partners.

Uptake

Successful application of optimisation methods in industrial decision‑making often requires significant expertise, which is not always accessible to domain specialists who understand industry needs. Current end‑user optimisation tools offer limited feedback and guidance, which affects trust and reduces uptake. OPTIMA transforms optimisation technology by prioritising ease of use, clarity and user confidence, making advanced methods more accessible to industry.

Advancing the state-of-the-art optimisation technologies to tackle industry challenges.

Our Projects

We have twelve current projects with our industry partners.

OPTIMA Small Grant Scheme

The OPTIMA Small Grant Scheme was designed to further the research potential of OPTIMA members. Each applicant could apply for up to $20,000 to complete an exciting project using optimisation methodolgies.

Publications

Type
Year
Publication

2026

  • G. Tack et al., MiniZinc. (Apr. 30, 2026). Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.19906053.

    Other View at DOI ↗

  • M. A. Muñoz, L. Zhang, H. Alipour, H. A. Khorshidi, and H. Wang, ‘Special issue on optimization in practice: selected papers from OPTIMA-CON 2024,’ Optimization Letters, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.1007/s11590-026-02299-5.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • G. Tack et al., MiniZinc. (Apr. 24, 2026). Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.19726160.

    Other View at DOI ↗

  • G. Tack et al., MiniZinc. (Jan. 23, 2026). Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.18348542.

    Other View at DOI ↗

2024

  • B. Moradi, M. Kirley, and M. A. Muñoz Acosta, ‘Sensitivity Analysis of Surrogate-assisted Bilevel Optimisation,’ Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, pp. 411–414, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1145/3638530.3654228.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

2023

  • H. Alsouly, M. Kirley, and M. A. Muñoz, ‘Dynamic Landscape Analysis for Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems,’ AI 2023: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 429–441, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-8388-9_35.

    Book Chapter View at DOI ↗

  • E. Albert, M. G. de la Banda, M. Gómez-Zamalloa, M. Isabel, and P. Stuckey, ‘Optimal dynamic partial order reduction with context-sensitive independence and observers,’ Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 202, p. 111730, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.111730.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • V. L. J. Somers and I. R. Manchester, ‘Minimizing the Risk of Spreading Processes via Surveillance Schedules and Sparse Control,’ IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 394–406, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1109/tcns.2022.3203359.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

2022

  • X. Wang, R. J. Hyndman, F. Li, and Y. Kang, ‘Forecast combinations: An over 50-year review,’ International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1518–1547, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2022.11.005.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • N. Neelofar, K. Smith-Miles, M. A. Muñoz, and A. Aleti, ‘Instance Space Analysis of Search-Based Software Testing,’ IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 2642–2660, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1109/tse.2022.3228334.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • N. Andrés‐Thió, M. Brazil, C. Ras, and D. Thomas, ‘Network augmentation for disaster‐resilience against geographically correlated failure,’ Networks, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 419–444, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1002/net.22138.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • K. Smith-Miles and M. A. Muñoz, ‘Instance Space Analysis for Algorithm Testing: Methodology and Software Tools,’ ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 1–31, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1145/3572895.

    Review View at DOI ↗

  • D. Bustos-Coral and A. M. Costa, ‘Drayage routing with heterogeneous fleet, compatibility constraints, and truck load configurations,’ Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 168, p. 102922, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102922.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • Z. Shireen et al., ‘A machine learning enabled hybrid optimization framework for efficient coarse-graining of a model polymer,’ npj Computational Materials, vol. 8, no. 1, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41524-022-00914-4.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • D. Zhao, H. Wang, J. Huang, and X. Lin, ‘Insurance Contract for High Renewable Energy Integration,’ 2022 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm), pp. 271–277, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1109/smartgridcomm52983.2022.9960994.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • S. Kandanaarachchi and R. J. Hyndman, ‘Anomaly detection in dynamic networks’, 2022, arXiv. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2210.07407.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • K. Smith-Miles and M. A. Muñoz, ‘Optimal construction of montages from mathematical functions on a spectrum of order–disorder preference,’ Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 347–373, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1080/17513472.2022.2139663.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • T. C. Lopes, A. S. Michels, N. Brauner, and L. Magatão, ‘Balancing-sequencing paced assembly lines: a multi-objective mixed-integer linear case study,’ International Journal of Production Research, vol. 61, no. 17, pp. 5901–5917, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2118888.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • E. Yap, M. A. Munoz, and K. Smith-Miles, ‘Informing Multiobjective Optimization Benchmark Construction Through Instance Space Analysis,’ IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1246–1260, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1109/tevc.2022.3205165.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • D. B. Huberman, B. J. Reich, and H. D. Bondell, ‘Correction: Nonparametric conditional density estimation in a deep learning framework for short-term forecasting,’ Environmental and Ecological Statistics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 913–913, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10651-022-00543-6.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • D. Rajapaksha, C. Bergmeir, and R. J. Hyndman, ‘LoMEF: A framework to produce local explanations for global model time series forecasts,’ International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1424–1447, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2022.06.006.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • B. Moya, R. Moreno, S. Püschel-Løvengreen, A. M. Costa, and P. Mancarella, ‘Uncertainty representation in investment planning of low-carbon power systems,’ Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 212, p. 108470, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108470.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • A. S. Michels and A. M. Costa, ‘Mixed-integer linear programming models for the type-II resource-constrained assembly line balancing problem,’ Assembly Automation, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 585–594, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1108/aa-10-2021-0140.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • C. Cheng, J.-W. Lu, R. Zhu, Z. Xiao, A. M. Costa, and R. G. Thompson, ‘An integrated multi-objective model for disaster waste clean-up systems optimization,’ Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 165, p. 102867, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102867.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • T. Zhang, J. Wang, H. Wang, J. Ruiyang, G. Li, and M. Zhou, ‘On the Coordination of Transmission-Distribution Grids: A Dynamic Feasible Region Method,’ IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1857–1868, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1109/tpwrs.2022.3197556.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • N. Andrés-Thió, M. A. Muñoz, and K. Smith-Miles, ‘Bifidelity Surrogate Modelling: Showcasing the Need for New Test Instances,’ INFORMS Journal on Computing, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 3007–3022, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1287/ijoc.2022.1217.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • R. Moss et al., ‘Forecasting COVID-19 activity in Australia to support pandemic response: May to October 2020,’ Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1101/2022.08.04.22278391.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • A. Panagiotelis, P. Gamakumara, G. Athanasopoulos, and R. J. Hyndman, ‘Probabilistic forecast reconciliation: Properties, evaluation and score optimisation,’ European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 306, no. 2, pp. 693–706, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.07.040.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • J. Liu, K. Marriott, T. Dwyer, and G. Tack, ‘Increasing User Trust in Optimisation through Feedback and Interaction,’ ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1–34, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1145/3503461.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • S. Ahmadi, G. Tack, D. Harabor, and P. Kilby, ‘Weight Constrained Path Finding with Bidirectional A*,’ Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 2–10, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1609/socs.v15i1.21746.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • N. James and H. Bondell, ‘Temporal and spectral governing dynamics of Australian hydrological streamflow time series,’ Journal of Computational Science, vol. 63, p. 101767, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101767.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • M. A. Muñoz, ‘Examining algorithm behavior using recurrence quantification and landscape analyses,’ Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, pp. 1658–1665, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1145/3520304.3534029.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • M. A. Muñoz, H. Soleimani, and S. Kandanaarachchi, ‘Benchmarking algorithm portfolio construction methods,’ Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, pp. 499–502, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1145/3520304.3528880.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • D. Herring, M. Kirley, and X. Yao, ‘Reproducibility and baseline reporting for dynamic multi-objective benchmark problems,’ Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 529–537, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1145/3512290.3528791.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • P. Y. A. Paiva, C. C. Moreno, K. Smith-Miles, M. G. Valeriano, and A. C. Lorena, ‘Relating instance hardness to classification performance in a dataset: a visual approach,’ Machine Learning, vol. 111, no. 8, pp. 3085–3123, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10994-022-06205-9.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • X. Wang, Y. Kang, R. J. Hyndman, and F. Li, ‘Distributed ARIMA models for ultra-long time series,’ International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1163–1184, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2022.05.001.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • V. L. J. Somers and I. R. Manchester, ‘Multi-Stage Sparse Resource Allocation for Control of Spreading Processes over Networks,’ 2022 American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 3632–3639, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.23919/acc53348.2022.9867834.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • I. Grossman, K. Bandara, T. Wilson, and M. Kirley, ‘Can machine learning improve small area population forecasts? A forecast combination approach,’ Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 95, p. 101806, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101806.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • S. Kandanaarachchi, H. Ochiai, and A. Rao, ‘Honeyboost: Boosting honeypot performance with data fusion and anomaly detection,’ Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 201, p. 117073, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117073.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • W. D. Xu, M. J. Burns, F. Cherqui, K. Smith‐Miles, and T. D. Fletcher, ‘Coordinated Control Can Deliver Synergies Across Multiple Rainwater Storages,’ Water Resources Research, vol. 58, no. 2, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1029/2021wr030266.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • N. James, M. Menzies, and H. Bondell, ‘In search of peak human athletic potential: A mathematical investigation,’ Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 32, no. 2, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1063/5.0073141.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • P. Sritharan, M. A. Muñoz, P. Pivonka, A. L. Bryant, H. Mokhtarzadeh, and L. G. Perraton, ‘Biomechanical Markers of Forward Hop-Landing After ACL-Reconstruction: A Pattern Recognition Approach,’ Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 330–342, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-02921-4.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • G. Athanasopoulos, R. J. Hyndman, N. Kourentzes, and M. O’Hara-Wild, ‘Probabilistic Forecasts Using Expert Judgment: The Road to Recovery From COVID-19,’ Journal of Travel Research, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 233–258, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1177/00472875211059240.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • Z. Ghasemi, H. A. Khorshidi, and U. Aickelin, ‘Multi-objective Semi-supervised Clustering for Finding Predictive Clusters’, 2022, arXiv. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2201.10764.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • M. Abolghasemi, R. J. Hyndman, E. Spiliotis, and C. Bergmeir, ‘Model selection in reconciling hierarchical time series,’ Machine Learning, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 739–789, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10994-021-06126-z.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • M. Azizi, U. Aickelin, H. A. Khorshidi, and M. B. Shishehgarkhaneh, ‘Shape and size optimization of truss structures by Chaos game optimization considering frequency constraints,’ Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 41, pp. 89–100, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.01.002.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • A. Ek, A. Schutt, P. J. Stuckey, and G. Tack, ‘Explaining Propagation for Gini and Spread with Variable Mean’, LIPIcs, Volume 235, CP 2022, vol. 235. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, pp. 21:1–21:16, 2022. doi: 10.4230/LIPICS.CP.2022.21.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • Y. Yang, H. Khorshidi, and U. Aickelin, ‘Cluster-based Diversity Over-sampling: A Density and Diversity Oriented Synthetic Over-sampling for Imbalanced Data,’ Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence, pp. 17–28, 2022, doi: 10.5220/0011381000003332.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • A. S. Michels and C. G. S. Sikora, ‘A survey on Benders Decomposition methods applied to Assembly Line Balancing Problems,’ IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 464–469, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.437.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • M. Becerra-Fernandez, L. E. Ruiz-Acosta, D. A. Camargo-Mayorga, and M. A. Muñoz, ‘A system dynamics model for sustainable corporate strategic planning’. SciELO journals, 2022. doi: 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.20363075.

    Dataset View at DOI ↗

  • A. Li, P. Stuckey, S. Koenig, and T. K. S. Kumar, ‘A FastMap-Based Algorithm for Block Modeling,’ Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research, pp. 232–248, 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-08011-1_16.

    Book Chapter View at DOI ↗

  • H. Bierlee, G. Gange, G. Tack, J. J. Dekker, and P. J. Stuckey, ‘Coupling Different Integer Encodings for SAT,’ Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research, pp. 44–63, 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-08011-1_5.

    Book Chapter View at DOI ↗

  • P. J. Stuckey and G. Tack, ‘Enumerated Types and Type Extensions for MiniZinc,’ Integration of Constraint Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Operations Research, pp. 374–389, 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-08011-1_25.

    Book Chapter View at DOI ↗

  • D. Herring, D. Pakravan, and M. Kirley, ‘Analysing Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Path Length Correlation,’ AI 2021: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 467–479, 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-97546-3_38.

    Book Chapter View at DOI ↗

2021

  • D. Zhao, H. Wang, J. Huang, and X. Lin, ‘Time-of-Use Pricing for Energy Storage Investment,’ IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1165–1177, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1109/tsg.2021.3136650.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • S. Kandanaarachchi, ‘Unsupervised anomaly detection ensembles using item response theory,’ Information Sciences, vol. 587, pp. 142–163, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.12.042.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • M. Blom, P. J. Stuckey, V. Teague, and D. Vukcevic, ‘A First Approach to Risk-Limiting Audits for Single Transferable Vote Elections’, arXiv, 2021, doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2112.09921.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • C. Kermorvant et al., ‘Reconstructing Missing and Anomalous Data Collected from High-Frequency In-Situ Sensors in Fresh Waters,’ International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 23, p. 12803, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312803.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • J. L. Yarmuch, M. Brazil, H. Rubinstein, and D. A. Thomas, ‘A model for open-pit pushback design with operational constraints,’ Optimization and Engineering, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11081-021-09699-9.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • A. S. Michels and A. M. Costa, ‘Conserving workforce while temporarily rebalancing assembly lines under demand disruption,’ International Journal of Production Research, vol. 60, no. 21, pp. 6616–6636, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2021.1998694.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • S. Kandanaarachchi and R. J. Hyndman, ‘Leave-One-Out Kernel Density Estimates for Outlier Detection,’ Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 586–599, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1080/10618600.2021.2000425.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • N. Andrés-Thió, M. Brazil, C. Ras, D. Thomas, and M. Volz, ‘An exact algorithm for constructing minimum Euclidean skeletons of polygons,’ Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 137–162, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10898-021-01101-3.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • M. Volz, M. Brazil, C. Ras, and D. Thomas, ‘Simplifying obstacles for Steiner network problems in the plane,’ Networks, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 77–92, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1002/net.22080.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • K. Leo, C. Mears, G. Tack, and M. Garcia de la Banda, ‘Globalizing constraint models,’ Artificial Intelligence, vol. 302, p. 103599, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2021.103599.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • T. C. Lopes, A. S. Michels, C. G. S. Sikora, N. Brauner, and L. Magatão, ‘Assembly line balancing for two cycle times: Anticipating demand fluctuations,’ Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 162, p. 107685, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107685.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • D. Whittle, M. Brazil, P. A. Grossman, J. H. Rubinstein, and D. A. Thomas, ‘Minimum Steiner trees on a set of concyclic points and their center,’ International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 2201–2225, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1111/itor.13055.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • A. De Coster, N. Musliu, A. Schaerf, J. Schoisswohl, and K. Smith-Miles, ‘Algorithm selection and instance space analysis for curriculum-based course timetabling,’ Journal of Scheduling, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 35–58, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10951-021-00701-x.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • F. J. Aragón Artacho, R. Campoy, and M. K. Tam, ‘Strengthened splitting methods for computing resolvents,’ Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 549–585, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10589-021-00291-6.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • E. R. Csetnek, A. Eberhard, and M. K. Tam, ‘Convergence rates for boundedly regular systems,’ Advances in Computational Mathematics, vol. 47, no. 5, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10444-021-09891-6.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • H. Hewamalage, P. Montero-Manso, C. Bergmeir, and R. J. Hyndman, ‘A Look at the Evaluation Setup of the M5 Forecasting Competition’, 2021, arXiv. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2108.03588.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • E. Spiliotis, M. Abolghasemi, R. J. Hyndman, F. Petropoulos, and V. Assimakopoulos, ‘Hierarchical forecast reconciliation with machine learning,’ Applied Soft Computing, vol. 112, p. 107756, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107756.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • K. Bandara, R. J. Hyndman, and C. Bergmeir, ‘MSTL: A Seasonal-Trend Decomposition Algorithm for Time Series with Multiple Seasonal Patterns’, 2021, arXiv. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2107.13462.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • A. Zamani, H. Haghbin, M. Hashemi, and R. J. Hyndman, ‘Seasonal functional autoregressive models,’ Journal of Time Series Analysis, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 197–218, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1111/jtsa.12608.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • E. Yap, M. A. Muñoz, and K. Smith-Miles, ‘On the diversity and robustness of parameterised multi-objective test suites,’ Applied Soft Computing, vol. 110, p. 107613, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107613.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • M. Ashouri, R. J. Hyndman, and G. Shmueli, ‘Fast Forecast Reconciliation Using Linear Models,’ Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 263–282, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1080/10618600.2021.1939038.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • S. Gupta, R. J. Hyndman, D. Cook, and A. Unwin, ‘Visualizing Probability Distributions Across Bivariate Cyclic Temporal Granularities,’ Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 14–25, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1080/10618600.2021.1938588.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • M. N. Dao, N. D. Dizon, J. A. Hogan, and M. K. Tam, ‘Constraint Reduction Reformulations for Projection Algorithms with Applications to Wavelet Construction,’ Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 190, no. 1, pp. 201–233, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10957-021-01878-z.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • J. Devriendt, S. Gocht, E. Demirović, J. Nordström, and P. J. Stuckey, ‘Cutting to the Core of Pseudo-Boolean Optimization: Combining Core-Guided Search with Cutting Planes Reasoning,’ Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 3750–3758, May 2021, doi: 10.1609/aaai.v35i5.16492.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • C. Cheng, R. Zhu, A. M. Costa, R. G. Thompson, and X. Huang, ‘Multi-period two-echelon location routing problem for disaster waste clean-up,’ Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1053–1083, May 2021, doi: 10.1080/23249935.2021.1916644.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • B. Rostami-Tabar, M. M. Ali, T. Hong, R. J. Hyndman, M. D. Porter, and A. Syntetos, ‘Forecasting for social good,’ International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1245–1257, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.02.010.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • C. M. Baker, I. Chades, J. McVernon, A. Robinson, and H. Bondell, ‘Optimal allocation of PCR tests to minimise disease transmission through contact tracing and quarantine,’ Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1101/2021.03.23.21254148.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • L. H. d. S. Fernandes, A. C. Lorena, and K. Smith-Miles, ‘Towards Understanding Clustering Problems and Algorithms: An Instance Space Analysis,’ Algorithms, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 95, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/a14030095.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • P. B. Castellucci, A. M. Costa, and F. Toledo, ‘Network scheduling problem with cross-docking and loading constraints,’ Computers & Operations Research, vol. 132, p. 105271, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2021.105271.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • J. L. Yarmuch, M. Brazil, H. Rubinstein, and D. A. Thomas, ‘A mathematical model for mineable pushback designs,’ International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 523–539, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1080/17480930.2021.1885582.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • M. A. Muñoz, M. Kirley, and K. Smith-Miles, ‘Analyzing randomness effects on the reliability of exploratory landscape analysis,’ Natural Computing, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 131–154, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11047-021-09847-1.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • I. Senthooran, P. Le Bodic, and P. J. Stuckey, ‘Optimising Training for Service Delivery’, LIPIcs, Volume 210, CP 2021, vol. 210. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, pp. 48:1–48:15, 2021. doi: 10.4230/LIPICS.CP.2021.48.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • H. Alipour, M. A. Munoz Acosta, and K. Smith-Miles, ‘Instance Space Analysis for the Maximum Flow Problem’. figshare, 2021. doi: 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.14761836.V1.

    Dataset View at DOI ↗

2020

  • M. K. Tam, ‘Gearhart–Koshy acceleration for affine subspaces,’ Operations Research Letters, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 157–163, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.orl.2020.12.007.

    Preprint View at DOI ↗

  • K. Smith-Miles, J. Christiansen, and M. A. Muñoz, ‘Revisiting where are the hard knapsack problems? via Instance Space Analysis,’ Computers & Operations Research, vol. 128, p. 105184, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2020.105184.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • K. Smith-Miles and X. Geng, ‘Revisiting Facial Age Estimation With New Insights From Instance Space Analysis,’ IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 2689–2697, May 2022, doi: 10.1109/tpami.2020.3038760.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • C. J. Ras, M. Brazil, and D. A. Thomas, ‘Computational complexity of the 2-connected Steiner network problem in the ℓ plane,’ Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 850, pp. 168–184, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2020.11.002.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • C. Cheng, R. Zhu, A. M. Costa, and R. G. Thompson, ‘Optimisation of waste clean-up after large-scale disasters,’ Waste Management, vol. 119, pp. 1–10, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.023.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • A. S. Michels and A. M. Costa, ‘A note to: A multiple-rule based constructive randomized search algorithm for solving assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem,’ Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 2121–2124, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10845-020-01632-8.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • Y. Kang, R. J. Hyndman, and F. Li, ‘GRATIS: GeneRAting TIme Series with diverse and controllable characteristics,’ Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 354–376, May 2020, doi: 10.1002/sam.11461.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

  • A. Ek, M. Garcia de la Banda, A. Schutt, P. J. Stuckey, and G. Tack, ‘Modelling and Solving Online Optimisation Problems,’ Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, no. 02, pp. 1477–1485, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1609/aaai.v34i02.5506.

    Journal Article View at DOI ↗

Meet our people

Meet our Partners

Our Governance Committees

OPTIMA

Advancing an industry-ready optimisation toolkit, while training a new generation of industry practitioners and over 120 young researchers, who will vanguard a highly skilled workforce of change agents for industrial transformation.

Monash University
Clayton, Victoria, 3080
Australia
University of Melbourne
Parkville, Victoria, 3010
Australia

© 2021 ARC Industrial Transformation Training Centre in Optimisation Technologies, Integrated Methodologies and Applications (OPTIMA)

Privacy Preference Center